- 閱讀權限
- 10
- UID
- 60877
- 積分
- 52
- 主題
- 0
- 帖子
- 52
- 精華
- 0
- 經驗
- 52 點
- 金幣
- 282 元
- 注冊時間
- 2014-11-3
該用戶從未簽到 - 帖子
- 52
- 精華
- 0
- 經驗
- 52 點
- 金幣
- 282 元
- 注冊時間
- 2014-11-3
|
Misguided optimism? EMS is here to stay.
By Stephen Newman
Published on 25 June, 2014
EMS (AHPNS) is not showing any evidence of going away, although its impact has been observed as “waning” in some areas. We know that some environments seem to be more consistent in terms of productivity than others, although it is difficult to draw broad across the board conclusions. Currently efforts are under way to characterize what common features might be present to explain why some are affected and others are not. I do not believe that this is going to solve the problem, although if we are lucky it may shed some additional light on those patterns that are already apparent to those in the field. If you want more information, ask.
Vibrio strains (as do many if not most strains of bacteria) readily exchange genetic material thus they are constantly evolving. It is unfortunate, but in most of the areas that are being affected, there is no universal agreement as to what is actually occurring. The fact that in all too many shrimp farming areas of the world, little attention is paid to biosecurity, shrimp are moved without regard to what they may be at risk of carrying, companies are pushing non-proven pseudo scientific solutions, etc. does not help. It is highly likely that this problem will continue to spread. Many farmers actually have no idea why their shrimp are dying.
Given the varying opinions about what is currently happening, I would characterize a lot of what is being reported as being akin to the reporting that originates in the fog of war. The truth is there to be had, but it is not as bad, or as good, as it is being depicted. The vibrio(s) responsible for AHPNS may have been selected for by the very methodologies that have been widely advocated for preventing problems of this nature.
The naïve view that bacterial problems are relatively simple contrasted with viral problems is part of this. Vibriosis due to any of many different vibrio species/strains is a common disease affecting shrimp farmers everywhere. Vibrios are essential for the recycling of chitin. Trying to eliminate them in outdoor environments (and indeed even in indoor environments) is, in my opinion, a fool’s mission. It further perpetuates the myth that bacteria are in some way always bad. The evidence suggests that stress can be a critical factor in this disease process (as it is in most disease processes) as is bio-amplification (this may actually be the key to controlling the impact) and that the widespread use of chlorine to disinfect shrimp ponds, rather than the use of a methodical process of pond preparation that allows a relatively mature and well balanced ecology to develop, is partly (largely?) to blame for the problem. As the mechanism(s) by which the strains produce disease becomes understood options that are not apparent at this time may become evident. For the time being though farmers would be a lot better off appreciating that there is a science to aquaculture and that ignoring it is something that they have done at their own peril. I would not bet on this changing any time in the near future.
Disease is natural. Its absence is not. Monoculture production environments that fail to account for the role of stress and the critical nature of the natural microbial processes in maintaining a balance are highly vulnerable. No talk of sustainable production will prevent problems of this nature. While responsible practices might be able to mitigate the development of problems of this ilk in the future, the very nature of the process ensures that we will continue to see periodic severe potentially industry wide disease problems well into the foreseeable future.
EMS(AHPNS)不顯示任何的證據,盡管其影響被觀察到的是在一些地區“減弱”。我們知道一些環境似乎更一致的生產率比其他人,盡管很難得出全面廣泛的結論。目前正在努力描述可能存在共同的特征來解釋為什么有些什么影響,而其他的則不能。我不相信這將解決這個問題,但如果我們幸運的話可能會提供一些額外的解釋這些模式,已經很明顯的領域。如果你想要更多的信息,問。
弧菌菌株(如做許多(如果不是大多數的細菌菌株)容易交換遺傳物質從而不斷發展的。這是不幸的,但在大多數領域的影響,沒有通用的協議,實際發生的是什么。的事實在太多蝦世界的農業地區,但很少注意生物安全,蝦是不考慮他們可能攜帶的風險,公司正在推動non-proven偽科學的解決方案,等沒有幫助。很有可能,這個問題將繼續蔓延。許多農民其實不知道為什么他們的蝦死亡。
考慮到不同看法正在發生什么事情,我認為許多被報道是類似于戰爭的報道,起源于霧。事實是有,但它不是那么糟糕,或者是好的,因為它被描述。弧菌(年代)負責AHPNS很可能是選擇的方法,對預防這種性質的問題被廣泛提倡。
天真地認為細菌問題是相對簡單的與病毒問題的一部分。弧菌病由于許多不同的物種/株弧菌是一種常見的疾病影響蝦農民無處不在。弧菌屬的回收甲殼素至關重要。試圖消除他們在戶外環境中(實際上即使在室內環境),在我看來,一個傻瓜的使命。進一步延續的神話,細菌在某些方面總是壞。有證據表明,壓力會是這種疾病的一個關鍵因素的過程(如在大多數疾病過程)是bio-amplification(這實際上可能是控制影響的關鍵),氯消毒蝦池的廣泛使用,而不是使用一個有條不紊的池塘準備的過程,允許一個相對成熟和平衡的生態發展,部分(很大程度上)負責的問題。機制(s)的菌株產生的疾病變得理解選項,這個時候可能變得明顯不明顯。目前盡管農民會更好欣賞很多,有科學養殖,忽略它他們做了自己的危險。我不會賭這個更改任何時間在不久的將來。
疾病是自然的。沒有不是。單一生產環境,不能占的角色壓力和臨界性質的自然微生物過程保持平衡是非常脆弱的。沒有談論可持續生產會阻止這種性質的問題。而負責任的做法可能會降低這些華麗的問題在未來的發展,這一過程的本質可以確保我們將繼續看到周期性嚴重的潛在的行業廣泛疾病問題到可預見的未來。
|
|
[復制鏈接]
本站會員
發表于 2014-11-4 10:23:53
匿名卡
顯身卡
狗仔卡
發表于 2014-11-4 10:33:55
